trafficmonsoon.com [RevShare]

[twardy]

Sprawdź:

Moze Charles sie w koncu poddal Mariuszowi i odbyla sie krucjata rozancowa w intencji pogonienia demonow z SEC? Moze TM w koncu wroci?

[adik7276]

Charles planuje nowy biznes bez ryzyka bo walka o TM może trwać latami. Kto się pisze ?

[twardy]

http://behindmlm.com/companies/traffic-m...e-the-usa/

No tak wlasnie widze... moze on planuje oddac ludziom kase z tego nowego biznesu?

[Begrezen]

o trafikmonsun jednak nie scam, szanuje motzno xD

[trio]

Fajnie ze ludzie odzyskuja swoje pieniadze.

[brdsrc]

Nie wiem czy było w innym temacie. Dzisiejszy post Charlesa na FB.
Największa beka z ludzi, którzy go bronią w komentarzach i wierzą, że cały czas walczy o TM.

Cytat:Dear USI-TECH Leaders,

The only real point I'm making is this: People have suffered from many programs over the years running out of money, meaning the account balances people see are not backed up by any real money. Some of those scams lasted years. Wouldn't it be good to detect this sort of thing early? Wouldn't it be great if we helped people avoid these problems?

The real offer on USI-TECH (which everyone can see) is to pay money to USI-TECH, and each day they will receive some money on their account until they reach 140% -- which is predicted to be in approx 140 business days (only trading Mon-Fri). The description for where this money is coming from is on the website too: Trading in crypto-currencies; which they say they typically get up to 150% returns for their clients annually.

They also say they typically trade for clients investing a minimum of $100,000. Now they are accepting everyone to tap into their trading abilities. So money spent is constantly being described as being used in trades to get returns for the client. This is the very definition of what a security is. I'm certain you can see this all for yourself.

So if this sort of offer holds concern whether or not it's a real investment or just a ponzi which runs out of money and can't pay balances.. to protect consumers a company really should help the potential client see with absolute certainty that when they invest with this company their money will be used as described and returns will come from the common enterprise as described.

That's why I keep talking about 3rd party accounting firms to verify the books are legit and the returns are truly coming from trades. Then the problem next comes-- what if this 3rd party accounting firm has been paid large sums of money to lie on behalf of the company? The only way to be certain is to have the government double check into everything. This is why it's vital for an offer such as USI-TECH to be registered with the SEC, and not have people out there lying about it.. or saying they don't need to be registered with the SEC, because the SEC's alert just basically disproved everything people have been saying about USI-TECH not needing to be registered with the SEC because it transacts off-shore and with bitcoin.. the statement from the SEC says the complete opposite when the SEC is empowered to protect USA citizens from frauds, even if they originate offshore. So definitely USI-Tech should register with the SEC to simply prove their offer is legit, and without that in place-- the offer should be questioned and doubted by default.

[twardy]

Czasami jak mam gorszy dzien to zajrze na bloga Galuszki/jego grupe na fb. Czlowiek sie posmieje i od razu humor lepszy... tacy debile, ze szkoda gadac

[trio]

To znaczy kto, wyznawcy galuszki czy wyznawcy scovilla ?

ten pierwszy za wielu ich nie ma ale pewnie aspiruje do slawy oszusta scovilla.

Mi sie wydaje ze to jedna szajka, szajka ktora ma wielu wielbicieli ktorym lubia prac mozgi.

[Captain]

Naprawdę są jeszcze ludzie którzy wierzą, że TM to uczciwa firma i że się podniesie i będzie działać dalej?

[twardy]

No oczywiscie xD Moj ulubiony komentarz na blogu Galuszki: